Epistemic Consequentialism, Veritism, and Scoring Rules

We argue that there is a tension between two monistic claims are the core of recent work in epistemic consequentialism. The first form monism about value, commonly known as veritism: accuracy sole final objective to be promoted domain. other class scoring rules: is, strictly proper rules only legitimate measures inaccuracy. These monisms, we argue, with each other. If has then alternatives rules. Our argument relies on way used contexts where rewarded, such education.